Medieval German Easterplays 6: Muri Easter Play Fragment I-III
Watch on YouTube →
Overview
Henrike Lähnemann examines the Muri Easter Play fragments as both a theatrical script and a material artifact: parchment leaves from a Zurich-area play were recycled as binding material in a Bible printed before 24 May 1466. Comparing the fragments with the Innsbruck Easter Play, she shows how Pilate and a comic peddler link the tomb-guarding story to a marketplace setting, while manuscript gaps, staging clues, Swiss German features, and the peddler’s sales pitch reveal how the play could have worked in performance.
Key takeaways
- The Muri Easter Play survives because parchment leaves from its manuscript were recycled into the binding of a Latin Bible printed before 24 May 1466; folds, cuts, and holes now limit what can be read.
- The Muri play adapts a shared German-speaking Easter-play tradition to a Zurich-area market setting, making Pilate a local judge who links otherwise separate scenes.
- The Muri peddler replaces the higher-status merchant of the Innsbruck Easter Play and connects the tomb guards’ bribe to the practical business of obtaining a market-selling permit.
- A hinged Easter sepulchre could stage Christ’s entombment, the guards’ vigil, and the empty tomb through changes to a single piece of furniture.
- Because the manuscript has few stage directions, performance details must be inferred from scene order, marginal cues such as a thunder note, surviving line counts, and comparisons with related plays.
- The peddler’s comic sales pitch combines beauty advice and erotic remedies with courtly-love language, while references to local people helped make the humor specific to the original audience.
Chapters
- Henrike Lähnemann uses a York mystery-play image to illustrate the expositor ludi, a director-like figure who reads from a scroll.
- The Muri Easter Play survives in a single manuscript reconstructed from parchment fragments rather than in a complete performance script.
- Nigel Palmer prepared the text used for the Muri play, and a facsimile allows readers to inspect its manuscript format.
- The Muri fragments were written on durable parchment, which was reused as binding material for a large-format Latin Bible.
- The Bible was printed before 24 May 1466, the date recorded by a purchaser; the parchment strips were added during a later binding.
- Folds, cut edges, and holes obscure parts of the play, while the surviving leaves preserve two-column layouts and writing oriented differently on the reverse.
- The Muri text and manuscript are associated with the Zurich region, unlike the Innsbruck Easter Play, which has a Thuringian origin and later travelled to Austria.
- Shared scenes across German-speaking Easter plays point to oral transmission as well as copying between manuscripts.
- Lähnemann situates Muri within a wider tradition that also includes Low German plays and other regional versions.
- The Muri play shares much of its scene sequence with the Innsbruck Easter Play but integrates its episodes more closely.
- Pilate becomes a local judge who hears requests on a market day, providing a central setting for encounters that occur in separate houses in the Innsbruck version.
- The Innsbruck merchant is recast as a lower-status peddler or hawker, who must obtain permission to sell goods.
- A hinged Easter sepulchre could show Christ lying in the tomb, conceal him behind the guards, and then reveal an empty tomb.
- The changing panels let one piece of furniture represent successive stages of the Resurrection story.
- The play begins amid negotiations between Pilate and the guards, suggesting an earlier prologue in which the Jews sought permission to arrange the tomb watch.
- The guards promise to protect the tomb and negotiate their payment with Pilate; money is more prominent as a plot device than in the Innsbruck version.
- Pilate’s market authority links the guards’ payment to a peddler’s fee for the right to sell goods.
- The manuscript offers few stage directions, so performers and directors had to infer transitions, entrances, and relationships between scenes.
- A marginal note indicating thunder may mark a break between performance days or a sound cue before the next scene.
- A guard can address the audience directly, echoing Pilate’s earlier interaction with the people gathered at the market.
- After witnessing the empty tomb, the guards testify that Christ has risen; their repeated statements turn the scene into a public declaration of belief.
- The surviving text displays Swiss Upper German spelling and sound patterns, which Lähnemann uses to distinguish the Muri language from standardized German.
- Pilate needs hush money for the guards, so the peddler’s request for a sales permit gives him a way to raise the required funds.
- The peddler advertises beauty products as ways to appear fairer and attract a lover, using comic salesmanship rather than the Innsbruck merchant’s more elevated status.
- A lengthy performance excerpt occupies much of this section, illustrating how the surviving scenes could be embodied onstage.
- The fragments omit lines, but the expected sheet dimensions and line counts allow scholars to estimate the gaps.
- At the next surviving fragment, the peddler is still delivering his sales pitch, confirming that the comic marketplace action continues across the missing text.
- The peddler mockingly borrows the language of courtly love to promise customers ways of winning noble ladies’ affection.
- His wares include beaver-derived substances and mandrake root, presented as sexual-performance remedies; the beaver story comes from the medieval natural-history tradition of the Physiologus.
- Lähnemann traces the changing connotations of German gai, from meanings associated with happiness or lustiness to taboo usage and later renewed acceptance.
- The next lecture will turn to the visitation section, where the peddler again connects comic material with the play’s more serious liturgical scenes.
Summary, takeaways, and chapters were generated by AI from the video's transcript and may contain errors. The video belongs to its creator, Henrike Lähnemann.